Alan Thawley seeks inclusion in case hearing Maternity Hospital's challenge to wife's death inquiry

The widower of a woman who died during surgery for an ectopic pregnancy says he should be joined as a notice party in a case being brought by the National Maternity Hospital (NMH) to try to prevent a further inquiry over the death.

Alan Thawley seeks inclusion in case hearing Maternity Hospital's challenge to wife's death inquiry

By Ann O'Loughlin

The widower of a woman who died during surgery for an ectopic pregnancy says he should be joined as a notice party in a case being brought by the National Maternity Hospital (NMH) to try to prevent a further inquiry over the death.

Alan Thawley, whose wife Malak Thawley (34) died at the hospital on May 8, 2016, has disputed claims he has no legal interest in the outcome of the NMH's action against the Minister for Health and Children seeking to prevent a statutory inquiry by the Health Information and Quality Authority (HIQA) arising out of her death.

The NMH says there has already been its own inquiry, a review of that inquiry, an inquest, and civil proceedings brought by Mr Thawley himself which were settled last January.

His involvement in the challenge to the Minister will elongate the case, re-litigate proceedings, increase legal costs and cause him additional distress, the NMH says.

In its proceedings seeking a judicial review of the Minister's decision, the NMH says a statutory inquiry will be extremely disruptive and have a "chilling effect" on the operation of maternity services.

The Minister ordered the inquiry on grounds including the practice of surgery outside of core hours, the seniority of staff on site out of hours, and the readiness to respond to major emergencies. The NMH says these are not grounds for a statutory inquiry.

Mr Thawley says he has a direct interest in the outcome of the challenge. He says the NMH inquiry was internal, fundamentally flawed and lacking in impartiality.

It also did not have as a member of the inquiry a vascular surgeon whose expertise was a critical feature of inquiring into what happened to his wife.

His counsel Richard Kean, opening his case to be joined in the NMH/Minister for Health proceedings, said his client wanted a fully independent all-embracing inquiry because he has never found out why it happened or precisely what happened.

If he was joined in this case, he would be afforded the opportunity to refute the NMH’s claim that he and his legal advisors had wrongly influenced the Minister in his decision to direct an inquiry. This was a simply incorrect claim, counsel said.

Earlier, counsel said the NMH argued there were three investigations. However, apart from the first, which was their own, the second was a review of that investigation carried out by the HSE, not another independent inquiry.

The third was the inquest in which the coroner found medical misadventure but Mr Thawley did not equate that with an independent review.

Mr Thawley found galling "an excuse" put forward by the Master of the NMH, Dr Rhona Mahony, that the hospital wanted to avoid any cost or further distress to him by not wanting him involved in the proceedings.

He disputed the NMH claim the inquiry would create a "chilling effect" on maternity services whereas he says there had been a chilling effect on them as a result of what happened to his wife.

Imogen McGrath BL, for the NMH, said despite the complex background to this case, what the court had to deal with was simply whether the outcome of the proceedings will directly affect Mr Thawley in accordance with court rules and case law.

It was the NMH view he did not have a vital interest in the outcome which is the test for joining someone as a notice party. He also did not have a legal right and his rights were not affected by the outcome, counsel said.

The NMH investigation was robust, thorough and peer-reviewed by an independent vascular surgeon and an overseas gynaecologist, counsel said.

The HSE reviewed that inquiry and found it thoroughly examined the case from a clinical perspective. It not only complied with the requirement of national guidelines for such reviews but in a number of respects exceeded those requirements.

HIQA had also reviewed the NMH report and initially said it was comprehensive and carried out in accordance with best practice although it later supported the Minister's decision for another inquiry, counsel said.

HIQA, which is a notice party, and the Minister are neutral in relation to Mr Thawley's application, the court heard.

Mr Justice Michael McGrath reserved his decision.

more courts articles

Man (25) in court charged with murdering his father and attempted murder of mother Man (25) in court charged with murdering his father and attempted murder of mother
Man appears in court charged with false imprisonment of woman in van Man appears in court charged with false imprisonment of woman in van
Man in court over alleged false imprisonment of woman Man in court over alleged false imprisonment of woman

More in this section

DUP Hold Crunch Meeting To Decide On Return To Stormont Jeffrey Donaldson steps down as DUP leader amid ‘historical’ sex offence charges
Berlin UKB Hospital Is Among Germany's Most Modern Nearly 10,000 people left waiting on trolleys across country in March
Spring weather Mar 28th 2024 Here's what to expect from weather and travel this Easter weekend
War_map
Cookie Policy Privacy Policy Brand Safety FAQ Help Contact Us Terms and Conditions

© Examiner Echo Group Limited