Judgement reserved in Denis O'Brien's action over Dáil statements

Businessman Denis O'Brien wants the Supreme Court to make findings that would be "entirely destructive" of, and would "effectively undermine", parliamentary speech, the State has argued before the court.

Judgement reserved in Denis O'Brien's action over Dáil statements

By Ann O'Loughlin

Businessman Denis O'Brien wants the Supreme Court to make findings that would be "entirely destructive" of, and would "effectively undermine", parliamentary speech, the State has argued before the court.

Maurice Collins SC said Mr O'Brien has brought proceedings arising out of utterances in the Dáil about his banking affairs by Social Democrats TD Catherine Murphy and Sinn Fein TD Pearse Doherty that would indirectly substitute the courts instead of the Dáil as the arbiter of "appropriate or inappropriate" parliamentary speech.

The proceedings were brought over the manner in which the Dáil Committee on Procedure and Privilege (CPP) handled and dismissed Mr O'Brien's complaint over the TDs' statements, made in May and June 2015, he said. The statements were made after Mr O'Brien got injunctions against RTE restrainiNg it publishing information about his banking affairs with State owned IBRC.

The CPP is an agent, and made up of, members of the Oireachtas, he said. Article 15 of the Constitution, which immunises parliamentary speech from legal action, means any decision of the Committee cannot be challenged in court.

All decisions by the CPP are "non-justiciable" and any attempt to have its findings reviewed by a court breaches the separation of powers.

In his submissions on behalf of the CPP, Michael Collins SC said any finding that the committee's decisions could be the subject of court actions meant any protection it had under Article 15 was "wholly illusionary".

In bringing his proceedings against over the CPP decision, Mr O'Brien was seeking to have the two TDs sanctioned for their statements, he argued.

In replying arguments for Mr O'Brien, Eileen Barrington SC said the State respondents were making "a stark case" which her client, who was directly affected by "an abuse of privilege", rejected.

Counsel were making submissions on the second and final day of Mr O'Brien's appeal against the High Court's dismissal of his case against the Oireachtas and the State over the statements made by the two TDs.

The Chief Justice, Mr Justice Frank Clarke, said the seven-judge court was reserving judgment. It may take some time before the court is in a position to deliver judgment, he added.

more courts articles

Micah Richards ‘grappled’ with man accused of headbutting Roy Keane, court told Micah Richards ‘grappled’ with man accused of headbutting Roy Keane, court told
Roy Keane ‘in shock’ after being ‘headbutted’ through doors, court told Roy Keane ‘in shock’ after being ‘headbutted’ through doors, court told
Roy Keane ‘in shock’ after being ‘headbutted’ through doors, court told Roy Keane ‘in shock’ after being ‘headbutted’ through doors, court told

More in this section

2024 Cross Border Police Conference on Organised & Serious Crime Garda deployed to Belfast amid concern over ‘abuse of Common Travel Area’
'Shameful': Number of homeless people surpasses 14,000 for first time 'Shameful': Number of homeless people surpasses 14,000 for first time
Israel-Hamas conflict Palestinian flag taken down from Leinster House
War_map
Cookie Policy Privacy Policy Brand Safety FAQ Help Contact Us Terms and Conditions

© Examiner Echo Group Limited